maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Combinatorial Basics › The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

Let f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals and g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals be functions. We write f=O(g), and say f is Big Oh of g, when there is a constant c and an integer n_0 so that f(n)\le cg(n) whenever n>n_0.

The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

Let \(f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals\) and \(g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals\) be functions. We write \(f=O(g)\), and say \(f\) is Big Oh of \(g\), when there is a constant \(c\) and an integer \(n_0\) so that \(f(n)\le cg(n)\) whenever \(n>n_0\). Although this notation has a long history, we can provide a quite modern justification. If \(f\) and \(g\) both describe the number of operations required for two algorithms given input size \(n\), then the meaning of \(f=O(g)\) is that \(f\) is no harder than \(g\) when the problem size is large.

We are particularly interested in comparing functions against certain natural benchmarks, , \(\log\log n\), \(\log n\), \(\sqrt{n}\), \(n^\alpha\) where \(\alpha\lt 1\), \(n\), \(n^2\), \(n^3\), \(n^c\) where \(c>1\) is a constant, \(n^{\log n}\), \(2^n\), \(n!\), \(2^{n^2}\),

For example, in we learned that there are sorting algorithms with running time \(O(n\log n)\) where \(n\) is the number of integers to be sorted. As a second example, we will learn that we can find all shortest paths in an oriented graph on \(n\) vertices with non-negative weights on edges with an algorithm having running time \(O(n^2)\). At the other extreme, no one knows whether there is a constant \(c\) and an algorithm for determining whether the chromatic number of a graph is at most three which has running time \(O(n^c)\).

It is important to remember that when we write \(f=O(g)\), we are implying in some sense that \(f\) is no bigger than \(g\), but it may in fact be much smaller. By contrast, there will be times when we really know that one function dominates another. And we have a second kind of notation to capture this relationship.

Let \(f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals\) and \(g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals\) be functions with \(f(n)>0\) and \(g(n)>0\) for all \(n\). We write \(f=o(g)\), and say that \(f\) is Little oh of \(g\), when \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(n)/g(n)=0\). For example \(\ln n=o(n^{.2})\); \(n^\alpha=o(n^{\beta})\) whenever \(0\lt \alpha\lt \beta\); and \(n^{100}=o(c^n)\) for every \(c>1\). In particular, we write \(f(n)=o(1)\) when \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(n)=0\).

Nå har du Ingen kalkulator setter opp denne, men brikkene kan brukes. Prøv en nedenfor eller skriv inn din egen.

Fortsett ditt eget arbeid

En gratis konto legger til notater om hver leksjon, en oversikt over hva du har fullført, problemene du har løst på ett sted og en lærer du kan spørre om. Matematikkene er åpne for alle, signerte på eller ikke.

Registrer Logg inn

Symboler som brukes her

Trykk på et symbol for den fulle definisjonen, et bilde og hva hver bokstav i det betyr.

Spørsmål folk stiller

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

Deler av denne siden er tilpasset fra Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). Kondensert og re-forklaret her, feil er vår.

Mer i Combinatorics & Graph Theory