maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Partially Ordered Sets › Interval Orders

Interval Orders

When we discussed , we commented that the algorithmic aspects would be deferred until later in the text. But there is one important class of orders for which the full solution is easy to obtain.

Interval Orders

When we discussed , we commented that the algorithmic aspects would be deferred until later in the text. But there is one important class of orders for which the full solution is easy to obtain.

A poset \(\PXP\) is called an interval order if there exists a function \(I\) assigning to each element \(x\in X\) a closed interval \(I(x)=[a_x,b_x]\) of the real line \(\reals\) so that for all \(x\), \(y\in X\), \(x\lt y\) in \(P\) if and only if \(b_x\lt a_y\) in \(\reals\). We call \(I\) an interval representation of \(\bfP\), or just a representation for short. For brevity, whenever we say that \(I\) is a representation of an interval order \(\PXP\), we will use the alternate notation \([a_x,b_x]\) for the closed interval \(I(x)\). Also, we let \(|I(x)|\) denote the length of the interval, , \(|I(x)|=b_x-a_x\). Returning to the poset \(\bfP_3\), the representation shown in shows that it is an interval order.

Note that end points of intervals used in a representation need not be distinct. In fact, distinct points \(x\) and \(y\) from \(X\) may satisfy \(I(x)=I(y)\). We even allow degenerate intervals, , those of the form \([a,a]\). On the other hand, a representation is said to be distinguishing if all intervals are non-degenerate and all end points are distinct. It is relatively easy to see that every interval order has a distinguishing representation.

As we shall soon see, interval orders can be characterized succinctly in terms of forbidden subposets. Before stating this characterization, we need to introduce a bit more notation. By \(\bfn\) (for \(n\geq 1\) an integer), we mean the chain with \(n\) points. \(\bfn\) chain with \(n\) points More precisely, we take the ground set to be \(\{0,1,\dots,n-1\}\) with \(i \lt j\) in \(\bfn\) if and only if \(i\lt j\) in \(\ints\). If \(\PXP\) and \(\QYQ\) are posets with \(X\) and \(Y\) disjoint, then \(\bfP+\bfQ\) \(\bfP+\bfQ\) disjoint sum of posets is the poset \(\bfR=(X\cup Y,R)\) where the partial order is given by \(z\leq w\) in \(R\) if and only if (a) \(z,w\in X\) and \(z\leq w\) in \(P\) or (b) \(z,w\in Y\) and \(z\leq w\) in \(Q\). Thus, \(\bfn+\bfm\) consists of a chain with \(n\) points and a chain with \(m\) points and no comparabilities between them. In particular, \(\bftwo+\bftwo\) can be viewed as a four-point poset with ground set \(\{a,b,c,d\}\) and \(a\lt b\) and \(c\lt d\) as the only relations (other than those required to make the relation reflexive).

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.

现在轮到你 没有计算器能解决这一个问题, 但其中的碎片是可以计算的。 请在下面尝试一个, 或者输入您自己的 。

实践 (3)

先在纸上试一个。 将答案显示为检查; 校验的答案可以在求解器中打开, 每一步都可用 。

  1. Consider the interval representation of an interval order shown below. The intervals depicted as vertical lines are degenerate intervals of the form \([z,z]\). List the elements that are less than \(m\) in this interval order.

  2. Consider the interval representation of an interval order shown below. The intervals depicted as vertical lines are degenerate intervals of the form \([z,z]\). List the elements that are incomparable to \(f\) in this interval order.

  3. Consider the poset whose diagram is shown below. Explain why this poset is not an interval order.

保持你自己的工作

免费账户在每一课上都添加注解, 记录你完成的, 在一个地方解决的, 以及您可以询问的关于此页的导师。 数学本身向每个人开放, 是否签名 。

签名上签名 登录

此处所用符号

输入完整定义、图片和其中每个字母的含义的符号。

人们对人们提出的问题

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

本页部分内容从 Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). 在这里进行浓缩和重新解释;错误属于我们。

更多 Combinatorics & Graph Theory