maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Pólya's Enumeration Theorem › Burnside's Lemma

Burnside's Lemma

Burnside's lemmaAgain, not originally proved by Burnside. It was known to Frobenius and for the most part by Cauchy. However, it was most easily found in Burnside's book, and thus his name came to be attached. relates the number of equivalence classes of the action of a group on a finite set to the number of elements of the set fixed by the elements of the group. Before stating and proving it, we need some notation and a proposition. If a group \(G\) acts on a finite set \(\cgC\), let \(\sim\) be the equivalence relation induced by this action. (As before, the action of \(\pi\in G\) on \(\cgC\) will be denoted \(\pi^*\).) Denote the equivalence class containing \(C\in \cgC\) by \(\langle C\rangle\)\(\langle C\rangle\)equivalence class of \(C\). For \(\pi\in G\), let \(\fix_\cgC(\pi)=\{C\in \cgC\colon \pi^*(C) = C\}\), the set of colorings fixed by \(\pi\). For \(C\in\cgC\), let \(\stab_G(C)=\{\pi\in G\colon \pi(C) = C\}\) be the stabilizer\(\stab_G(C)\)stabilizer of \(C\) under action of \(G\) of \(C\) in \(G\), the permutations in \(G\) that fix \(C\).

To illustrate these concepts before applying them, refer back to . Using that information, we can determine that \(\fix_\cgC(r_2) = \{C_1,C_{10},C_{11},C_{16}\}\). Determining the stabilizer of a coloring requires finding the rows of the table in which it appears. Thus, \(\stab_{D_8}(C_7) = \{\iota,h\}\) and \(\stab_{D_8}(C_{11}) = \{\iota,r_2,p,n\}\).

Proposition

Let a group \(G\) act on a finite set \(\cgC\). Then for all \(C\in \cgC\), \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]

Proof

Let \(\stab_G(C) = \{\pi_1,\dots,\pi_k\}\) and \(T(C,C') = \{\pi\in G\colon \pi^*(C) = C'\}\). (Note that \(T(C,C) = \stab_G(C)\).) Take \(\pi\in T(C,C')\). Then \(\pi\circ \pi_i\in T(C,C')\) for \(1\leq i\leq k\). Furthermore, if \(\pi\circ \pi_i = \pi\circ \pi_j\), then \(\pi^{-1}\circ\pi\circ \pi_i=\pi^{-1}\circ\pi\circ \pi_j\). Thus \(\pi_i=\pi_j\) and \(i=j\). If \(\pi'\in T(C,C')\), then \(\pi\inv\circ \pi'\in T(C,C)\). Thus, \(\pi\inv\circ\pi' = \pi_i\) for some \(i\), and hence \(\pi' = \pi\circ \pi_i\). Therefore \(T(C,C') = \{\pi\circ\pi_1,\dots,\pi\circ\pi_k\}\). Additionally, we observe that \(T(C',C) = \{\pi\inv\colon \pi\in T(C,C')\}\). Now for all \(C'\in\langle C\rangle\), \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] Therefore, \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] Now notice that each element of \(G\) appears in \(T(C,C')\) for precisely one \(C'\in\langle C\rangle\), and the proposition follows.

With established, we are now prepared for Burnside's lemma.

Before we proceed to the proof, note that the calculation in Burnside's lemma for the example of \(2\)-coloring the vertices of a square is exactly the calculation we performed at the end of .

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.

现在轮到你没有计算器能解决这一个问题, 但其中的碎片是可以计算的。请在下面尝试一个, 或者输入您自己的。

保持你自己的工作

免费账户在每一课上都添加注解, 记录你完成的, 在一个地方解决的, 以及您可以询问的关于此页的导师。数学本身向每个人开放, 是否签名。

签名上签名登录

此处所用符号

输入完整定义、图片和其中每个字母的含义的符号。

人们对人们提出的问题

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

本页部分内容从 Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). 在这里进行浓缩和重新解释;错误属于我们。

Burnside's Lemma

此处所用符号

人们对人们提出的问题

更多 Combinatorics & Graph Theory