maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Generating Functions › Basic Notation and Terminology

Basic Notation and Terminology

With a sequence \sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\} of real numbers, we associate a function F(x) defined by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] The word function is put in quotes as we do not necessarily care about substituting a value…

Basic Notation and Terminology

With a sequence \(\sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\}\) of real numbers, we associate a function \(F(x)\) defined by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] The word function is put in quotes as we do not necessarily care about substituting a value of \(x\) and obtaining a specific value for \(F(x)\). In other words, we consider \(F(x)\) as a formal power series and frequently ignore issues of convergence.

It is customary to refer to \(F(x)\) as the generating function of the sequence \(\sigma\). As we have already remarked, we are not necessarily interested in calculating \(F(x)\) for specific values of \(x\). However, by convention, we take \(F(0)=a_0\).

Example

Consider the constant sequence \(\sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\}\) with \(a_n=1\) for every \(n\ge0\). Then the generating function \(F(x)\) of \(\sigma\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\], which is called the infinite geometric series.

You may remember that this last expression is the Maclaurin series for the function \(F(x)=1/(1-x)\) and that the series converges when \(|x|\lt 1\). Since we want to think in terms of formal power series, let's see that we can justify the expression \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] without any calculus techniques. Consider the product \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] and notice that, since we multiply formal power series just like we multiply polynomials (power series are pretty much polynomials that go on forever), we have that this product is \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] Now we have that \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] or, more usefully, after dividing through by \(1-x\), \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]

The method of can be adapted to address the finite geometric series \(\sum_{j=0}^n x^j\). In that case, we look at \[\begin{aligned}(1-x) \sum_{j=0}^nx^j \amp= \sum_{j=0}^n x^j - \sum_{j=0}^n x^{j+1} \\ \amp= (1+x+\cdots + x^n) - (x+x^2+\cdots x^n + x^{n+1})\end{aligned}\]. Looking carefully, we see that everything cancels in the final expression except \(1-x^{n+1}\). Dividing both sides by \(1-x\) gives us \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] as the formula for the sum of a finite geometric series.

For reference, we state the following elementary result, which emphasizes the form of a product of two power series.

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.

现在轮到你 没有计算器能解决这一个问题, 但其中的碎片是可以计算的。 请在下面尝试一个, 或者输入您自己的 。

保持你自己的工作

免费账户在每一课上都添加注解, 记录你完成的, 在一个地方解决的, 以及您可以询问的关于此页的导师。 数学本身向每个人开放, 是否签名 。

签名上签名 登录

此处所用符号

输入完整定义、图片和其中每个字母的含义的符号。

人们对人们提出的问题

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

本页部分内容从 Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). 在这里进行浓缩和重新解释;错误属于我们。

更多 Combinatorics & Graph Theory