maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Inclusion-Exclusion › Enumerating Surjections

Enumerating Surjections

As our first example of the power of inclusion-exclusion, consider the following situation: A grandfather has 15 distinct lottery tickets and wants to distribute them to his four grandchildren so that each child gets at…

Enumerating Surjections

As our first example of the power of inclusion-exclusion, consider the following situation: A grandfather has \(15\) distinct lottery tickets and wants to distribute them to his four grandchildren so that each child gets at least one ticket. In how many ways can he make such a distribution? At first, this looks a lot like the problem of enumerating integer solutions of equations, except here the lottery tickets are not identical! A ticket bearing the numbers \(1\), \(3\), \(10\), \(23\), \(47\), and \(50\) will almost surely not pay out the same amount as one with the numbers \(2\), \(7\), \(10\), \(30\), \(31\), and \(48\), so who gets which ticket really makes a difference. Hopefully, you have already recognized that the fact that we're dealing with lottery tickets and grandchildren isn't so important here. Rather, the important fact is that we want to distribute distinguishable objects to distinct entities, which calls for counting functions from one set (lottery tickets) to another (grandchildren). In our example, we don't simply want the total number of functions, but instead we want the number of surjections, so that we can ensure that every grandchild gets a ticket.

For positive integers \(n\) and \(m\), let \(S(n,m)\) denote the number of surjections from \([n]\) to \([m]\). Note that \(S(n,m)=0\) when \(n\lt m\). In this section, we apply the Inclusion-Exclusion formula to determine a formula for \(S(n,m)\). We start by setting \(X\) to be the set of all functions from \([n]\) to \([m]\). Then for each \(f\in X\) and each \(i=1,2,\dots,m\), we say that \(f\) satisfies property \(P_i\) if \(i\) is not in the image of \(f\).

Now the following result follows immediately from this lemma by applying the , as there are \(C(m,k)\) \(k\)-element subsets of \([m]\).

For example, \[\begin{aligned}S(5,3) \amp = \binom{3}{0}(3-0)^5-\binom{3}{1}(3-1)^5+\binom{3}{2}(3-2)^5-\binom{3}{3}(3-3)^5 \\ \amp = 243 -96+3-0 \\ \amp = 150.\end{aligned}\]

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.

이제 너 계산기는 이것을 해결하지 않지만, 그 조각은 계산 가능합니다. 아래의 하나를 시도하거나 자신의 것을 입력하십시오.

자신의 작업을 유지

무료 계정은 모든 수업에 노트를 추가, 당신이 완료 한 기록, 당신이 해결 한 문제를 한 곳에, 그리고 당신이이 페이지에 대해 물어 수업 지도자. 수학 자체는 모두에게 열려 있습니다, 로그인 여부.

가입하기 로그인

여기서 사용된 기호

기호를 탭하면 전체 정의, 이미지 및 각 문자의 의미를 확인할 수 있습니다.

사람들이 묻는 질문

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

이 페이지의 일부는 다음에서 변경되었습니다. Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). 여기서 압축하고 다시 설명; 오류는 우리의.

에 더 Combinatorics & Graph Theory