maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Generating Functions › Basic Notation and Terminology

Basic Notation and Terminology

With a sequence \sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\} of real numbers, we associate a function F(x) defined by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] The word function is put in quotes as we do not necessarily care about substituting a value…

Basic Notation and Terminology

With a sequence \(\sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\}\) of real numbers, we associate a function \(F(x)\) defined by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] The word function is put in quotes as we do not necessarily care about substituting a value of \(x\) and obtaining a specific value for \(F(x)\). In other words, we consider \(F(x)\) as a formal power series and frequently ignore issues of convergence.

It is customary to refer to \(F(x)\) as the generating function of the sequence \(\sigma\). As we have already remarked, we are not necessarily interested in calculating \(F(x)\) for specific values of \(x\). However, by convention, we take \(F(0)=a_0\).

Example

Consider the constant sequence \(\sigma=\{a_n:n\ge0\}\) with \(a_n=1\) for every \(n\ge0\). Then the generating function \(F(x)\) of \(\sigma\) is given by \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\], which is called the infinite geometric series.

You may remember that this last expression is the Maclaurin series for the function \(F(x)=1/(1-x)\) and that the series converges when \(|x|\lt 1\). Since we want to think in terms of formal power series, let's see that we can justify the expression \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] without any calculus techniques. Consider the product \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] and notice that, since we multiply formal power series just like we multiply polynomials (power series are pretty much polynomials that go on forever), we have that this product is \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] Now we have that \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] or, more usefully, after dividing through by \(1-x\), \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]

The method of can be adapted to address the finite geometric series \(\sum_{j=0}^n x^j\). In that case, we look at \[\begin{aligned}(1-x) \sum_{j=0}^nx^j \amp= \sum_{j=0}^n x^j - \sum_{j=0}^n x^{j+1} \\ \amp= (1+x+\cdots + x^n) - (x+x^2+\cdots x^n + x^{n+1})\end{aligned}\]. Looking carefully, we see that everything cancels in the final expression except \(1-x^{n+1}\). Dividing both sides by \(1-x\) gives us \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] as the formula for the sum of a finite geometric series.

For reference, we state the following elementary result, which emphasizes the form of a product of two power series.

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.

이제 너 계산기는 이것을 해결하지 않지만, 그 조각은 계산 가능합니다. 아래의 하나를 시도하거나 자신의 것을 입력하십시오.

자신의 작업을 유지

무료 계정은 모든 수업에 노트를 추가, 당신이 완료 한 기록, 당신이 해결 한 문제를 한 곳에, 그리고 당신이이 페이지에 대해 물어 수업 지도자. 수학 자체는 모두에게 열려 있습니다, 로그인 여부.

가입하기 로그인

여기서 사용된 기호

기호를 탭하면 전체 정의, 이미지 및 각 문자의 의미를 확인할 수 있습니다.

사람들이 묻는 질문

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

이 페이지의 일부는 다음에서 변경되었습니다. Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). 여기서 압축하고 다시 설명; 오류는 우리의.

에 더 Combinatorics & Graph Theory