maths.free › Abstract Algebra › Cyclic Groups › The Method of Repeated Squares
The Method of Repeated Squares
Computing large powers can be very time-consuming. Just as anyone can compute 2^2 or 2^8, everyone knows how to compute \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\].
The Method of Repeated Squares
Computing large powers can be very time-consuming. Just as anyone can compute \(2^2\) or \(2^8\), everyone knows how to compute \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]. However, such numbers are so large that we do not want to attempt the calculations; moreover, past a certain point the computations would not be feasible even if we had every computer in the world at our disposal. Even writing down the decimal representation of a very large number may not be reasonable. It could be thousands or even millions of digits long. However, if we could compute something like \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\], we could very easily write the result down since it would be a number between \(0\) and \(46{,}388\). If we want to compute powers modulo \(n\) quickly and efficiently, we will have to be clever. The results in this section are needed only in
The first thing to notice is that any number \(a\) can be written as the sum of distinct powers of \(2\); that is, we can write \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\], where \(k_1 \lt k_2 \lt \cdots \lt k_n\). This is just the binary representation of \(a\). For example, the binary representation of \(57\) is \(111001\), since we can write \(57 = 2^0 + 2^3 + 2^4 + 2^5\).
The laws of exponents still work in \({\mathbb Z}_n\); that is, if \(b \equiv a^x \pmod{ n}\) and \(c \equiv a^y \pmod{ n}\), then \(bc \equiv a^{x+y} \pmod{ n}\). We can compute \(a^{2^k} \pmod{ n}\) in \(k\) multiplications by computing \[\begin{aligned}a^{2^0} \pmod{ n} \\ a^{2^1} \pmod{ n } \\ \vdots \\ a^{2^k} \pmod{ n}\end{aligned}\]. Each step involves squaring the answer obtained in the previous step, dividing by \(n\), and taking the remainder.
The method of repeated squares will prove to be a very useful tool when we explore RSA cryptography in . To encode and decode messages in a reasonable manner under this scheme, it is necessary to be able to quickly compute large powers of integers mod \(n\).
Sage support for cyclic groups is a little spotty but we can still make effective use of Sage and perhaps this situation could change soon.
Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
À vous Aucune calculatrice ne tranche celle-ci, mais ses éléments sont calculables. Essayez-en un ci-dessous, ou tapez le vôtre.
Un compte gratuit ajoute des notes sur chaque leçon, un enregistrement de ce que vous avez terminé, vos problèmes résolus en un seul endroit, et un tuteur que vous pouvez demander sur cette page. Les maths eux-mêmes sont ouverts à tout le monde, signé ou non.
Inscription ConnexionSymboles utilisés ici
Appuyez sur n'importe quel symbole pour la définition complète, une image et ce que signifie chaque lettre.
Questions posées par les gens
What is a group, in plain words?
A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group. That is where the idea came from.
What is the difference between a ring and a field?
A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.
Certaines parties de cette page sont adaptées de Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Condensés et réexpliqués ici ; les erreurs sont les nôtres.
Plus en Abstract Algebra
GroupsSubgroups, cosets and Lagrange's theoremCyclic groups and permutation groupsHomomorphisms, normal subgroups and quotient groupsRings and fieldsGalois theory: why the quintic has no formula