maths.free › Abstract Algebra › Group Actions › Groups Acting on Sets

Groups Acting on Sets

Let X be a set and G be a group. A (left) action of G on X is a map G \times X \rightarrow X given by (g,x) \mapsto gx, where ex = x for all x \in X; (g_1 g_2)x = g_1(g_2 x) for all x \in X and all g_1, g_2 \in G

Groups Acting on Sets

Let \(X\) be a set and \(G\) be a group. A (left) action of \(G\) on \(X\) is a map \(G \times X \rightarrow X\) given by \((g,x) \mapsto gx\), where

  1. \(ex = x\) for all \(x \in X\);

  2. \((g_1 g_2)x = g_1(g_2 x)\) for all \(x \in X\) and all \(g_1, g_2 \in G\).

Under these considerations \(X\) is called a \(G\)-set. Notice that we are not requiring \(X\) to be related to \(G\) in any way. It is true that every group \(G\) acts on every set \(X\) by the trivial action \((g,x) \mapsto x\); however, group actions are more interesting if the set \(X\) is somehow related to the group \(G\).

Example

Let \(G = GL_2( {\mathbb R} )\) and \(X = {\mathbb R}^2\). Then \(G\) acts on \(X\) by left multiplication. If \(v \in {\mathbb R}^2\) and \(I\) is the identity matrix, then \(Iv = v\). If \(A\) and \(B\) are \(2 \times 2\) invertible matrices, then \((AB)v = A(Bv)\) since matrix multiplication is associative.

Example

Let \(G = D_4\) be the symmetry group of a square. If \(X = \{ 1, 2, 3, 4 \}\) is the set of vertices of the square, then we can consider \(D_4\) to consist of the following permutations: \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]. The elements of \(D_4\) act on \(X\) as functions. The permutation \((1 \, 3)(2 \, 4)\) acts on vertex \(1\) by sending it to vertex \(3\), on vertex \(2\) by sending it to vertex \(4\), and so on. It is easy to see that the axioms of a group action are satisfied.

In general, if \(X\) is any set and \(G\) is a subgroup of \(S_X\), the group of all permutations acting on \(X\), then \(X\) is a \(G\)-set under the group action \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] for \(\sigma \in G\) and \(x \in X\).

Example

If we let \(X = G\), then every group \(G\) acts on itself by the left regular representation; that is, \((g,x) \mapsto \lambda_g(x) = gx\), where \(\lambda_g\) is left multiplication: \[\begin{aligned}e \cdot x = \lambda_e x = ex = x \\ (gh) \cdot x = \lambda_{gh}x = \lambda_g \lambda_h x = \lambda_g(hx) = g \cdot ( h \cdot x)\end{aligned}\]. If \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\), then \(G\) is an \(H\)-set under left multiplication by elements of \(H\).

If \(G\) acts on a set \(X\) and \(x, y \in X\), then \(x\) is said to be \(G\)-equivalent to \(y\) if there exists a \(g \in G\) such that \(gx =y\). We write \(x \sim_G y\) or \(x \sim y\) if two elements are \(G\)-equivalent.

Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.

Nå har du Ingen kalkulator setter opp denne, men brikkene kan brukes. Prøv en nedenfor eller skriv inn din egen.

Fortsett ditt eget arbeid

En gratis konto legger til notater om hver leksjon, en oversikt over hva du har fullført, problemene du har løst på ett sted og en lærer du kan spørre om. Matematikkene er åpne for alle, signerte på eller ikke.

Registrer Logg inn

Symboler som brukes her

Trykk på et symbol for den fulle definisjonen, et bilde og hva hver bokstav i det betyr.

Spørsmål folk stiller

What is a group, in plain words?

A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group. That is where the idea came from.

What is the difference between a ring and a field?

A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.

Deler av denne siden er tilpasset fra Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Kondensert og re-forklaret her, feil er vår.

Mer i Abstract Algebra