maths.free › Numerical Methods › Floating point and error

Floating point and error

Why 0.1 + 0.2 ≠ 0.3 on a computer, and how error propagates.

Computers store numbers in binary with ~16 significant digits; 0.1 is not representable exactly. Round-off accumulates, and subtracting nearly equal numbers destroys digits (cancellation). Picture it: 255 in binary is 11111111, and 0.1 in binary never terminates. Think it: a stable algorithm keeps error growth linear; conditioning is a property of the problem, stability of the method.

Pracovný príklad · 0.1 + 0.2

Arithmetic · Arithmetic

Evaluate 0.1 + 0.2

0.1 + 0.2

Krok za krokom

  1. 0.3 = \frac{3}{10}

    Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.

  2. \frac{3}{10} = 0.3

    Simplify.

Odhaliť odpoveď
0.3

Teraz ty Vyberte si problém, alebo napíšte alebo nakreslite vlastný.Každý krok, obrázok, odpoveď skrytá, kým sa neopýtate.

Udržujte svoje vlastné pracovné

Bezplatný účet pridáva poznámky ku každej lekcii, záznam o tom, čo ste dokončili, vaše vyriešené problémy na jednom mieste, a učiteľa, ktorého sa môžete opýtať na túto stránku.Math samotná je otvorená pre každého, prihlásený alebo nie.

Zaregistrovať sa Prihlásenie

Symboly použité tu

Ťuknutím na ľubovoľný symbol zobrazíte úplnú definíciu, obrázok a význam každého písmena.

Ako nakupovať: Floating point and error

  1. Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.
  2. Simplify.

Otázky, ktoré ľudia kladú

Why not just solve exactly?

Most equations have no closed-form solution at all, and many that do are unusable in practice. A numerical method delivers as many correct digits as you need, and a good one tells you how many that is.

Why can Newton's method fail?

If it starts where the tangent is nearly flat it shoots far away; near a repeated root it slows to a crawl; and with several roots it may land on the wrong one. A bracketing method like bisection is slower but cannot fail.

Viac v kategórii Numerical Methods

Root finding: bisection and Newton's methodNumerical integration: trapezoid and SimpsonInterpolation and Taylor approximation