maths.free › Numerical Methods › Floating point and error

Floating point and error

Why 0.1 + 0.2 ≠ 0.3 on a computer, and how error propagates.

Computers store numbers in binary with ~16 significant digits; 0.1 is not representable exactly. Round-off accumulates, and subtracting nearly equal numbers destroys digits (cancellation). Picture it: 255 in binary is 11111111, and 0.1 in binary never terminates. Think it: a stable algorithm keeps error growth linear; conditioning is a property of the problem, stability of the method.

Eksempel på arbeid · 0.1 + 0.2

Arithmetic · Arithmetic

Evaluate 0.1 + 0.2

0.1 + 0.2

Steg for trinn

  1. 0.3 = \frac{3}{10}

    Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.

  2. \frac{3}{10} = 0.3

    Simplify.

Vis svaret
0.3

Nå har du Velg et problem, eller skriv inn, eller tegne din egen. Hvert steg, et bilde, svaret skjult til du spør.

Fortsett ditt eget arbeid

En gratis konto legger til notater om hver leksjon, en oversikt over hva du har fullført, problemene du har løst på ett sted og en lærer du kan spørre om. Matematikkene er åpne for alle, signerte på eller ikke.

Registrer Logg inn

Symboler som brukes her

Trykk på et symbol for den fulle definisjonen, et bilde og hva hver bokstav i det betyr.

Hvordan: Floating point and error

  1. Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.
  2. Simplify.

Spørsmål folk stiller

Why not just solve exactly?

Most equations have no closed-form solution at all, and many that do are unusable in practice. A numerical method delivers as many correct digits as you need, and a good one tells you how many that is.

Why can Newton's method fail?

If it starts where the tangent is nearly flat it shoots far away; near a repeated root it slows to a crawl; and with several roots it may land on the wrong one. A bracketing method like bisection is slower but cannot fail.

Mer i Numerical Methods

Root finding: bisection and Newton's methodNumerical integration: trapezoid and SimpsonInterpolation and Taylor approximation