maths.free › Frontiers › Goldbach's conjecture

Goldbach's conjecture

Every even number greater than 2 is the sum of two primes.

The statement. 4 = 2 + 2, 6 = 3 + 3, 8 = 3 + 5, 100 = 3 + 97 … Every even integer above 2 is the sum of two primes. Proposed in a letter from Goldbach to Euler in 1742.

In plain words. Primes are the multiplicative atoms of the integers; Goldbach says they also generate the even numbers additively, two at a time. It has been checked up to 4 × 10¹⁸.

What you need first. Stage 10 (primes and the prime factorisation), Stage 12 (the analytic tools that gave the partial results).

The parts. (1) Counting: how many ways can 2n be split as p + q? Heuristically about 2n/(ln 2n)², plenty, so the conjecture “should” be true. (2) The circle method (Hardy-Littlewood), which turns counting representations into an integral of exponential sums. (3) The weak version (every odd number above 5 is a sum of three primes), which the same method actually proves (Helfgott, 2013). (4) Sieve methods, which get as far as “every large even number is a prime plus a number with at most two prime factors” (Chen, 1973).

What is known. The weak conjecture is a theorem; Chen's theorem stands; the strong conjecture is verified to 4 × 10¹⁸ and unproved.

Sekarang Anda Tidak ada kalkulator yang bisa menuntaskan soal ini, tetapi bagian-bagiannya dapat dihitung. Coba salah satu di bawah ini, atau ketik soal Anda sendiri.

Simpan pekerjaan Anda sendiri

Sebuah akun gratis menambahkan catatan pada setiap pelajaran, catatan apa yang telah Anda selesaikan, masalah yang Anda selesaikan di satu tempat, dan tutor yang dapat Anda tanyakan tentang halaman ini. matematika itu sendiri terbuka untuk semua orang, ditandatangani atau tidak.

Daftar Masuk

Simbol yang digunakan di sini

Sentuh simbol apapun untuk definisi lengkap, gambar, dan apa setiap huruf di dalamnya berarti.

Pertanyaan yang sering diajukan

Can I actually work on these?

You can understand them, which is the honest first step and what these pages are for. Working on them means the full path through the stages above and then the research literature, but every person who has made progress started by reading the statement.

Why are they unsolved if so many people have tried?

Usually because the existing tools provably cannot work (the barriers in P vs NP), or because the problem mixes two structures mathematics handles separately (additive and multiplicative in Goldbach and Collatz). A solution needs a genuinely new idea.

Lainnya di Frontiers