maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Combinatorial Basics › The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

Let f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals and g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals be functions. We write f=O(g), and say f is Big Oh of g, when there is a constant c and an integer n_0 so that f(n)\le cg(n) whenever n>n_0.

The Big Oh and Little Oh Notations

Let \(f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals\) and \(g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals\) be functions. We write \(f=O(g)\), and say \(f\) is Big Oh of \(g\), when there is a constant \(c\) and an integer \(n_0\) so that \(f(n)\le cg(n)\) whenever \(n>n_0\). Although this notation has a long history, we can provide a quite modern justification. If \(f\) and \(g\) both describe the number of operations required for two algorithms given input size \(n\), then the meaning of \(f=O(g)\) is that \(f\) is no harder than \(g\) when the problem size is large.

We are particularly interested in comparing functions against certain natural benchmarks, , \(\log\log n\), \(\log n\), \(\sqrt{n}\), \(n^\alpha\) where \(\alpha\lt 1\), \(n\), \(n^2\), \(n^3\), \(n^c\) where \(c>1\) is a constant, \(n^{\log n}\), \(2^n\), \(n!\), \(2^{n^2}\),

For example, in we learned that there are sorting algorithms with running time \(O(n\log n)\) where \(n\) is the number of integers to be sorted. As a second example, we will learn that we can find all shortest paths in an oriented graph on \(n\) vertices with non-negative weights on edges with an algorithm having running time \(O(n^2)\). At the other extreme, no one knows whether there is a constant \(c\) and an algorithm for determining whether the chromatic number of a graph is at most three which has running time \(O(n^c)\).

It is important to remember that when we write \(f=O(g)\), we are implying in some sense that \(f\) is no bigger than \(g\), but it may in fact be much smaller. By contrast, there will be times when we really know that one function dominates another. And we have a second kind of notation to capture this relationship.

Let \(f:\posints\longrightarrow \reals\) and \(g:\posints\longrightarrow\reals\) be functions with \(f(n)>0\) and \(g(n)>0\) for all \(n\). We write \(f=o(g)\), and say that \(f\) is Little oh of \(g\), when \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(n)/g(n)=0\). For example \(\ln n=o(n^{.2})\); \(n^\alpha=o(n^{\beta})\) whenever \(0\lt \alpha\lt \beta\); and \(n^{100}=o(c^n)\) for every \(c>1\). In particular, we write \(f(n)=o(1)\) when \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(n)=0\).

Nu er du Ingen lommeregner afgør dette, men stykkerne af det er komputerbare. Prøv en nedenfor, eller skriv din egen.

Fortsæt med at arbejde

En gratis konto tilføjer noter om hver lektion, en rekord over, hvad du har afsluttet, dine løste problemer på ét sted, og en vejleder, du kan spørge om denne side. Matematik selv er åben for alle, logget på eller ej.

Tilmeld dig Login

Symboler brugt her

Tryk på ethvert symbol for den fulde definition, et billede, og hvad hvert bogstav i det betyder.

Spørgsmål folk spørger

Permutation or combination?

Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).

What is a graph in this sense?

Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.

Dele af denne side er tilpasset fra Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). Kondenseret og genforklaret her; fejl er vores.

Mere i Combinatorics & Graph Theory