Dilworth's Chain Covering Theorem and its Dual

In this section, we prove the following theorem of R.P. Dilworth, which is truly one of the classic results of combinatorial mathematics.

Before proceeding with the proof of Dilworth's theorem later in this section, we pause to discuss the dual version for partitions into antichains, as it is even easier to prove.

When \(\PXP\) is a poset, a point \(x\in X\) with \(\height(x)=1\) is called a minimal point of \(\bfP\). We denote the set of all minimal points of a poset \(\PXP\) by \(\min(X,P)\).Since we use the notation \(\bfP= (X,P)\) for a poset, the set of minimal elements can be denoted by \(\min(\bfP)\) or \(\min(X,P)\). This convention will be used for all set valued and integer valued functions of posets.

The argument given for the proof of yields an efficient algorithm, one that is defined recursively. Set \(\bfP_0= \bfP\). If \(\bfP_i\) has been defined and \(\bfP_i\neq \emptyset\), let \(A_i=\min(\bfP_i)\) and then let \(\bfP_{i+1}\) denote the subposet remaining when \(A_i\) is removed from \(\bfP_i\).

In , we illustrate the antichain partition provided by this algorithm for the \(17\) point poset from . The darkened points form a chain of size\(5\).

Maximal antichains and maximum antichains are defined analogously.

Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.