maths.free › Combinatorics & Graph Theory › Pólya's Enumeration Theorem › Burnside's Lemma
Burnside's Lemma
Burnside's lemmaAgain, not originally proved by Burnside. It was known to Frobenius and for the most part by Cauchy. However, it was most easily found in Burnside's book, and thus his name came to be attached.
Burnside's Lemma
Burnside's lemmaAgain, not originally proved by Burnside. It was known to Frobenius and for the most part by Cauchy. However, it was most easily found in Burnside's book, and thus his name came to be attached. relates the number of equivalence classes of the action of a group on a finite set to the number of elements of the set fixed by the elements of the group. Before stating and proving it, we need some notation and a proposition. If a group \(G\) acts on a finite set \(\cgC\), let \(\sim\) be the equivalence relation induced by this action. (As before, the action of \(\pi\in G\) on \(\cgC\) will be denoted \(\pi^*\).) Denote the equivalence class containing \(C\in \cgC\) by \(\langle C\rangle\)\(\langle C\rangle\)equivalence class of \(C\). For \(\pi\in G\), let \(\fix_\cgC(\pi)=\{C\in \cgC\colon \pi^*(C) = C\}\), the set of colorings fixed by \(\pi\). For \(C\in\cgC\), let \(\stab_G(C)=\{\pi\in G\colon \pi(C) = C\}\) be the stabilizer\(\stab_G(C)\)stabilizer of \(C\) under action of \(G\) of \(C\) in \(G\), the permutations in \(G\) that fix \(C\).
To illustrate these concepts before applying them, refer back to . Using that information, we can determine that \(\fix_\cgC(r_2) = \{C_1,C_{10},C_{11},C_{16}\}\). Determining the stabilizer of a coloring requires finding the rows of the table in which it appears. Thus, \(\stab_{D_8}(C_7) = \{\iota,h\}\) and \(\stab_{D_8}(C_{11}) = \{\iota,r_2,p,n\}\).
With established, we are now prepared for Burnside's lemma.
Before we proceed to the proof, note that the calculation in Burnside's lemma for the example of \(2\)-coloring the vertices of a square is exactly the calculation we performed at the end of .
Condensed: the full section is in Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics.
À vous Aucune calculatrice ne tranche celle-ci, mais ses éléments sont calculables. Essayez-en un ci-dessous, ou tapez le vôtre.
Un compte gratuit ajoute des notes sur chaque leçon, un enregistrement de ce que vous avez terminé, vos problèmes résolus en un seul endroit, et un tuteur que vous pouvez demander sur cette page. Les maths eux-mêmes sont ouverts à tout le monde, signé ou non.
Inscription ConnexionSymboles utilisés ici
Appuyez sur n'importe quel symbole pour la définition complète, une image et ce que signifie chaque lettre.
Questions posées par les gens
Permutation or combination?
Ask whether order matters. A lock code is a permutation (order matters); a hand of cards is a combination (it does not).
What is a graph in this sense?
Dots (vertices) joined by lines (edges), not a plot. Road maps, social networks and molecules are graphs; questions like "is there a route" and "how few colours" are graph theory.
Certaines parties de cette page sont adaptées de Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics (CC BY-SA 4.0). Condensés et réexpliqués ici ; les erreurs sont les nôtres.
Plus en Combinatorics & Graph Theory
The counting principlesPigeonhole principle and inclusion, exclusionBinomial coefficients and Pascal's triangleRecurrences and generating functionsGraphs: vertices, edges, degreesPaths, cycles, trees, Euler and HamiltonColouring and planar graphs