maths.free › Abstract Algebra › Polynomials › The Division Algorithm

The Division Algorithm

Recall that the division algorithm for integers () says that if a and b are integers with b \gt 0, then there exist unique integers q and r such that a = bq + r, where 0 \leq r \lt b.

The Division Algorithm

Recall that the division algorithm for integers () says that if \(a\) and \(b\) are integers with \(b \gt 0\), then there exist unique integers \(q\) and \(r\) such that \(a = bq + r\), where \(0 \leq r \lt b\). The algorithm by which \(q\) and \(r\) are found is just long division. A similar theorem exists for polynomials. The division algorithm for polynomials has several important consequences. Since its proof is very similar to the corresponding proof for integers, it is worthwhile to review at this point.

Example

The division algorithm merely formalizes long division of polynomials, a task we have been familiar with since high school. For example, suppose that we divide \(x^3 - x^2 + 2 x - 3\) by \(x - 2\).

			\(x^2\)	\(+\)	\(x\)	\(+\)	\(4\)
\(x\)	\(-\)	\(2\)	\(x^3\)	\(-\)	\(x^2\)	\(+\)	\(2x\)	\(-\)	\(3\)
			\(x^3\)	\(-\)	\(2x^2\)
					\(x^2\)	\(+\)	\(2x\)	\(-\)	\(3\)
					\(x^2\)	\(-\)	\(2x\)
							\(4x\)	\(-\)	\(3\)
							\(4x\)	\(-\)	\(8\)
									\(5\)

Hence, \(x^3 - x^2 + 2 x - 3 = (x - 2) (x^2 + x + 4 ) + 5\).

Let \(p(x)\) be a polynomial in \(F[x]\) and \(\alpha \in F\). We say that \(\alpha\) is a zero or root of \(p(x)\) if \(p(x)\) is in the kernel of the evaluation homomorphism \(\phi_{\alpha}\). All we are really saying here is that \(\alpha\) is a zero of \(p(x)\) if \(p(\alpha) = 0\).

Corollary

Let \(F\) be a field. An element \(\alpha \in F\) is a zero of \(p(x) \in F[x]\) if and only if \(x - \alpha\) is a factor of \(p(x)\) in \(F[x]\).

Proof

Suppose that \(\alpha \in F\) and \(p( \alpha ) = 0\). By the division algorithm, there exist polynomials \(q(x)\) and \(r(x)\) such that \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] and the degree of \(r(x)\) must be less than the degree of \(x -\alpha\). Since the degree of \(r(x)\) is less than \(1\), \(r(x) = a\) for \(a \in F\); therefore, \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]. But \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] consequently, \(p(x) = (x - \alpha) q(x)\), and \(x - \alpha\) is a factor of \(p(x)\).

Conversely, suppose that \(x - \alpha\) is a factor of \(p(x)\); say \(p(x) = (x - \alpha) q(x)\). Then \(p( \alpha ) = 0 \cdot q(\alpha) = 0\).

Notice the similarity between the proof of and the proof of .

Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.

Nyt sinä Yksikään laskin ei ratkaise tätä, mutta sen osat ovat yhtä totta. Kokeile alla olevaa tai kirjoita omasi.

Pidä oma työsi

Vapaa tili lisää muistiinpanoja jokaiseen oppituntiin, muistiinpanoja siitä, mitä olet saanut päätökseen, ratkaistuja ongelmiasi yhdessä paikassa ja ohjaajaa, jolta voit kysyä tästä sivusta. Matematiikka on kaikille avoin, kirjautunut tai ei.

Rekisteröidy Kirjautuminen

Symbolit, joita käytetään täällä

Napauta symbolia koko määrittelyn, kuvan ja sen jokaisen kirjaimen osalta.

Kysymyksiä

What is a group, in plain words?

A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group. That is where the idea came from.

What is the difference between a ring and a field?

A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.

Osaa tästä sivusta on muokattu Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Tässä on tiivistetty ja selitetty uudelleen, virheet ovat meidän.

Lisää Abstract Algebra

Groups Subgroups, cosets and Lagrange's theorem Cyclic groups and permutation groups Homomorphisms, normal subgroups and quotient groups Rings and fields Galois theory: why the quintic has no formula