maths.free › Abstract Algebra › 3. Groups › Subgroups
Subgroups
Sometimes we wish to investigate smaller groups sitting inside a larger group. The set of even integers 2{\mathbb Z} = \{\ldots, -2, 0, 2, 4, \ldots \} is a group under the operation of addition.
Definitions and Examples
Sometimes we wish to investigate smaller groups sitting inside a larger group. The set of even integers \(2{\mathbb Z} = \{\ldots, -2, 0, 2, 4, \ldots \}\) is a group under the operation of addition. This smaller group sits naturally inside of the group of integers under addition. We define a subgroup \(H\) of a group \(G\) to be a subset \(H\) of \(G\) such that when the group operation of \(G\) is restricted to \(H\), \(H\) is a group in its own right. Observe that every group \(G\) with at least two elements will always have at least two subgroups, the subgroup consisting of the identity element alone and the entire group itself. The subgroup \(H = \{ e \}\) of a group \(G\) is called the trivial subgroup. A subgroup that is a proper subset of \(G\) is called a proper subgroup. In many of the examples that we have investigated up to this point, there exist other subgroups besides the trivial and improper subgroups.
Example
Consider the set of nonzero real numbers, \({\mathbb R}^*\), with the group operation of multiplication. \(\mathbb R^*\) the multiplicative group of real numbers The identity of this group is \(1\) and the inverse of any element \(a \in {\mathbb R}^*\) is just \(1/a\). We will show that \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] is a subgroup of \({\mathbb R}^*\). \(\mathbb Q^*\) the multiplicative group of rational numbers The identity of \({\mathbb R}^*\) is \(1\); however, \(1 = 1/1\) is the quotient of two nonzero integers. Hence, the identity of \({\mathbb R}^*\) is in \({\mathbb Q}^*\). Given two elements in \({\mathbb Q}^*\), say \(p/q\) and \(r/s\), their product \(pr/qs\) is also in \({\mathbb Q}^*\). The inverse of any element \(p/q \in {\mathbb Q}^*\) is again in \({\mathbb Q}^*\) since \((p/q)^{-1} = q/p\). Since multiplication in \({\mathbb R}^*\) is associative, multiplication in \({\mathbb Q}^*\) is associative.
Example
Recall that \({\mathbb C}^{\ast}\) is the multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers. Let \(H = \{ 1, -1, i, -i \}\). Then \(H\) is a subgroup of \({\mathbb C}^{\ast}\). It is quite easy to verify that \(H\) is a group under multiplication and that \(H \subset {\mathbb C}^{\ast}\).
Condensed — the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
Some Subgroup Theorems
Let us examine some criteria for determining exactly when a subset of a group is a subgroup.
Condensed — the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
Symbols used here
x belongs to A; every element of A is in B.
i² = −1.
The two sides are different.
Naturals, integers, rationals, reals, complex numbers.
Marks the point where the statement has been established.
n divides a − b; a and b have the same remainder.
b is a multiple of a; the largest number dividing both.
A set with an operation; the do-nothing element; the element that undoes g.
Same structure; the group of cosets of a normal subgroup N.
The remainders 0…n−1 with clock arithmetic.
The set of morphisms; do g then f.
Questions people ask
What is a group, in plain words?
A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group — that is where the idea came from.
What is the difference between a ring and a field?
A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.
Обиди се со себе.
Parts of this page are adapted from Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Condensed and re-explained here; errors are ours.
Повеќе во Abstract Algebra
GroupsSubgroups, cosets and Lagrange's theoremCyclic groups and permutation groupsHomomorphisms, normal subgroups and quotient groupsRings and fieldsGalois theory: why the quintic has no formula