maths.free › Abstract Algebra › Groups › Subgroups
Subgroups
Sometimes we wish to investigate smaller groups sitting inside a larger group. The set of even integers 2{\mathbb Z} = \{\ldots, -2, 0, 2, 4, \ldots \} is a group under the operation of addition.
Definitions and Examples
Sometimes we wish to investigate smaller groups sitting inside a larger group. The set of even integers \(2{\mathbb Z} = \{\ldots, -2, 0, 2, 4, \ldots \}\) is a group under the operation of addition. This smaller group sits naturally inside of the group of integers under addition. We define a subgroup \(H\) of a group \(G\) to be a subset \(H\) of \(G\) such that when the group operation of \(G\) is restricted to \(H\), \(H\) is a group in its own right. Observe that every group \(G\) with at least two elements will always have at least two subgroups, the subgroup consisting of the identity element alone and the entire group itself. The subgroup \(H = \{ e \}\) of a group \(G\) is called the trivial subgroup. A subgroup that is a proper subset of \(G\) is called a proper subgroup. In many of the examples that we have investigated up to this point, there exist other subgroups besides the trivial and improper subgroups.
Example
Consider the set of nonzero real numbers, \({\mathbb R}^*\), with the group operation of multiplication. \(\mathbb R^*\) the multiplicative group of real numbers The identity of this group is \(1\) and the inverse of any element \(a \in {\mathbb R}^*\) is just \(1/a\). We will show that \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] is a subgroup of \({\mathbb R}^*\). \(\mathbb Q^*\) the multiplicative group of rational numbers The identity of \({\mathbb R}^*\) is \(1\); however, \(1 = 1/1\) is the quotient of two nonzero integers. Hence, the identity of \({\mathbb R}^*\) is in \({\mathbb Q}^*\). Given two elements in \({\mathbb Q}^*\), say \(p/q\) and \(r/s\), their product \(pr/qs\) is also in \({\mathbb Q}^*\). The inverse of any element \(p/q \in {\mathbb Q}^*\) is again in \({\mathbb Q}^*\) since \((p/q)^{-1} = q/p\). Since multiplication in \({\mathbb R}^*\) is associative, multiplication in \({\mathbb Q}^*\) is associative.
Example
Recall that \({\mathbb C}^{\ast}\) is the multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers. Let \(H = \{ 1, -1, i, -i \}\). Then \(H\) is a subgroup of \({\mathbb C}^{\ast}\). It is quite easy to verify that \(H\) is a group under multiplication and that \(H \subset {\mathbb C}^{\ast}\).
Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
Some Subgroup Theorems
Let us examine some criteria for determining exactly when a subset of a group is a subgroup.
Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
Now you Ոչ մի հաշվիչ չի կարող լուծել այս խնդիրը, բայց դրա մասերը հաշվարկելի են։ Փորձեք ստորեւ նշվածներից մեկը կամ գրեք ձեր սեփականը։
Ազատ հաշիվը յուրաքանչյուր դասավանդման համար գրառումներ է ավելացնում, Ձեր ավարտելիք դասերի և լուծված խնդիրների ցուցակ է պահում մեկ տեղում, և ուսուցիչ, ում կարող եք հարցնել այս էջի մասին։ Մաթեմատիկան բաց է բոլորի համար, անկախ նրանից մուտքագրվել եք արդյոք կամ ոչ։
Գրանցվել ԳրանցումՕգտագործված սիմվոլներ
Տեղադրեք ցանկացած նշան՝ ամբողջական սահմանման, նկարի և դրա մեջ ամեն մի տառի իմաստը տեսնելու համար։
Հարցեր, որոնք մարդիկ տալիս են :
What is a group, in plain words?
A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group. That is where the idea came from.
What is the difference between a ring and a field?
A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.
Այս էջը կառուցված է հետևյալ սկզբունքով. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Ընդհանուր և հատուկ դասակարգումներ: Ընդհանուր դասակարգում.
Ցուցադրել Abstract Algebra
GroupsSubgroups, cosets and Lagrange's theoremCyclic groups and permutation groupsHomomorphisms, normal subgroups and quotient groupsRings and fieldsGalois theory: why the quintic has no formula