maths.free › Abstract Algebra › Rings › Integral Domains and Fields
Integral Domains and Fields
Let us briefly recall some definitions. If R is a commutative ring and r is a nonzero element in R, then r is said to be a zero divisor if there is some nonzero element s \in R such that rs = 0.
Integral Domains and Fields
Let us briefly recall some definitions. If \(R\) is a commutative ring and \(r\) is a nonzero element in \(R\), then \(r\) is said to be a zero divisor if there is some nonzero element \(s \in R\) such that \(rs = 0\). A commutative ring with identity is said to be an integral domain if it has no zero divisors. If an element \(a\) in a ring \(R\) with identity has a multiplicative inverse, we say that \(a\) is a unit. If every nonzero element in a ring \(R\) is a unit, then \(R\) is called a division ring. A commutative division ring is called a field.
Example
If \(i^2 = -1\), then the set \({\mathbb Z}[ i ] = \{ m + ni : m, n \in {\mathbb Z} \}\) forms a ring known as the Gaussian integers. \(\mathbb Z[i]\) the Gaussian integers It is easily seen that the Gaussian integers are a subring of the complex numbers since they are closed under addition and multiplication. Let \(\alpha = a + bi\) be a unit in \({\mathbb Z}[ i ]\). Then \(\overline{\alpha} = a - bi\) is also a unit since if \(\alpha \beta = 1\), then \(\overline{\alpha} \overline{\beta} = 1\). If \(\beta = c + di\), then \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\]. Therefore, \(a^2 + b^2\) must either be \(1\) or \(-1\); or, equivalently, \(a + bi = \pm 1\) or \(a + bi = \pm i\). Therefore, units of this ring are \(\pm 1\) and \(\pm i\); hence, the Gaussian integers are not a field. We will leave it as an exercise to prove that the Gaussian integers are an integral domain.
Example
The set of matrices \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\] with entries in \({\mathbb Z}_2\) forms a field.
Example
The set \({\mathbb Q}( \sqrt{2}\, ) = \{ a + b \sqrt{2} : a, b \in {\mathbb Q} \}\) is a field. The inverse of an element \(a + b \sqrt{2}\) in \({\mathbb Q}( \sqrt{2}\, )\) is \[\begin{aligned}\end{aligned}\].
We have the following alternative characterization of integral domains.
The following surprising theorem is due to Wedderburn.
For any nonnegative integer \(n\) and any element \(r\) in a ring \(R\) we write \(r + \cdots + r\) (\(n\) times) as \(nr\). We define the characteristic of a ring \(R\) to be the least positive integer \(n\) such that \(nr = 0\) for all \(r \in R\). If no such integer exists, then the characteristic of \(R\) is defined to be \(0\). We will denote the characteristic of \(R\) by \(\chr R\). \(\chr R\) characteristic of a ring \(R\)
Condensed: the full section is in Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications.
Dabar tu Joks skaičiuotuvas nenusistato, bet jo dalys yra skaičiuojamos. Pabandykite vieną žemiau arba įveskite savo.
Nemokama paskyra prideda pastabas apie kiekvieną pamoką, įrašą apie tai, ką baigėte, savo išspręstas problemas vienoje vietoje ir mokytoją, kurį galite paklausti apie šį puslapį. Pati matematika yra atvira visiems, kurie yra ar nėra užsiregistravę.
Prisijungti PrisijungtiČia naudojami simboliai
Bakstelėkite visus simbolius, kad būtų galima apibrėžti visą apibrėžimą, paveikslėlį ir ką reiškia kiekviena raidė.
Klausimai, kuriuos klausia žmonės
What is a group, in plain words?
A set with one operation that is associative, has an identity, and lets every element be undone. Symmetries of any object form a group. That is where the idea came from.
What is the difference between a ring and a field?
A ring has addition and multiplication that behave like the integers (you cannot always divide); a field is a ring where every non-zero element has a reciprocal, like the rationals or the reals.
Šio puslapio dalys pritaikytos nuo Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications (GFDL 1.3). Čia yra įtikinamų ir iš naujo paaiškintų klaidų.
Daugiau informacijos Abstract Algebra
GroupsSubgroups, cosets and Lagrange's theoremCyclic groups and permutation groupsHomomorphisms, normal subgroups and quotient groupsRings and fieldsGalois theory: why the quintic has no formula