maths.free › Set Theory & Logic › Logic and methods of proof

Logic and methods of proof

Connectives, quantifiers, direct proof, contrapositive, contradiction, induction.

A proof is a chain of statements each following from earlier ones by a rule of inference. Direct proof assumes the hypothesis and derives the conclusion; contrapositive proves ¬Q → ¬P instead; contradiction assumes ¬Q and finds an absurdity; induction climbs the integers. Picture it: the truth table below, p → q and ¬p ∨ q agree in every row, which is the contrapositive method justified. Think it: Gödel showed any consistent system rich enough for arithmetic has true statements it cannot prove.

Apstrādāts piemērs · truth table of (p implies q) iff (not p or q)

Truth table of (p implies q) iff (not p or q)

Solis pēc kārtas

  1. \left(p \Rightarrow q\right) \Leftrightarrow \left(q \vee \neg p\right)

    2 variable(s) → 4 rows. Fill in every combination.

  2. \

    A tautology (always true).

Atbildēt uz šo jautājumu
\left(p \Rightarrow q\right) \Leftrightarrow \left(q \vee \neg p\right)

Tagad tu Izvēlieties problēmu, vai ierakstiet vai zīmējiet savu. Katrs solis, attēls, atbilde slēpta, līdz jūs lūgt.

Saglabāt savu darbu

Bezmaksas konts pievieno piezīmes par katru nodarbību, ierakstu par to, ko esat pabeidzis, jūsu atrisinātās problēmas vienā vietā, un pasniedzēju, kuru varat jautāt par šo lapu. Pati matemātika ir pieejama ikvienam, kas ir vai nav parakstījies.

Pierakstīties Pieteikšanās

Šeit izmantotie simboli

Piesitiet visiem simboliem, kas apzīmē pilnu definīciju, attēlu un ko katrs burts tajā nozīmē.

Kā lietot: Logic and methods of proof

  1. Write the statement as "if P then Q" with P and Q precise.
  2. Choose a method: direct (assume P), contrapositive (assume not Q), contradiction (assume P and not Q), or induction (for all n).
  3. Each line must cite a definition, an axiom or a previous line.
  4. End when Q appears; mark it ∎.

Jautājumi, ko cilvēki vaicā

Are some infinities bigger than others?

Yes. The integers and the rationals can be listed; the real numbers cannot (Cantor's diagonal argument), so there are strictly more reals than integers.

What is the difference between a relation and a function?

A relation pairs inputs with outputs freely; a function is a relation in which every input gets exactly one output.

Vairāk Set Theory & Logic