maths.free › Number Theory › Congruences › Euler's theorem
Euler's theorem
In number theory, Euler's theorem (also known as the Fermat-Euler theorem or Euler's totient theorem) states that, if n and a are coprime positive integers, then is congruent to modulo n, where denotes Euler's totient…
Euler's theorem
In number theory, Euler's theorem (also known as the Fermat-Euler theorem or Euler's totient theorem) states that, if n and a are coprime positive integers, then \(a^{\varphi(n)}\) is congruent to \(1\) modulo n, where \(\varphi\) denotes Euler's totient function; that is
\(a^{\varphi (n)} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}.\)
In 1736, Leonhard Euler published a proof of Fermat's little theorem (stated by Fermat without proof), which is the restriction of Euler's theorem to the case where n is a prime number. Subsequently, Euler presented other proofs of the theorem, culminating with his paper of 1763, in which he proved a generalization to the case where n is not prime.
The converse of Euler's theorem is also true: if the above congruence is true, then \(a\) and \(n\) must be coprime.
The theorem is further generalized by some of Carmichael's theorems.
The theorem may be used to easily reduce large powers modulo \(n\). For example, consider finding the ones place decimal digit of \(7^{222}\), i.e. \(7^{222} \pmod{10}\). The integers 7 and 10 are coprime, and \(\varphi(10) = 4\). So Euler's theorem yields \(7^4 \equiv 1 \pmod{10}\), and we get \(7^{222} \equiv 7^{4 \times 55 + 2} \equiv (7^4)^{55} \times 7^2 \equiv 1^{55} \times 7^2 \equiv 49 \equiv 9 \pmod{10}\).
In general, when reducing a power of \(a\) modulo \(n\) (where \(a\) and \(n\) are coprime), one needs to work modulo \(\varphi(n)\) in the exponent of \(a\):
if \(x \equiv y \pmod{\varphi(n)}\), then \(a^x \equiv a^y \pmod{n}\).
Euler's theorem underlies the RSA cryptosystem, which is widely used in Internet communications. In this cryptosystem, Euler's theorem is used with n being a product of two large prime numbers, and the security of the system is based on the difficulty of factoring such an integer.
Proofs
1. Euler's theorem can be proven using concepts from the theory of groups: The residue classes modulo n that are coprime to n form a group under multiplication (see the article Multiplicative group of integers modulo n for details). The order of that group is φ(n). Lagrange's theorem states that the order of any subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the entire group, in this case φ(n). If a is any number coprime to n then a is in one of these residue classes, and its powers a, a, ... , a modulo n form a subgroup of the group of residue classes, with a ≡ 1 (mod n). Lagrange's theorem says k must divide φ(n), i.e. there is an integer M such that kM = φ(n). This then implies,
\(a^{\varphi(n)} = a^{kM} = (a^{k})^M \equiv 1^M =1 \pmod{n}.\)
2. There is also a direct proof: Let R = {x1, x2, ... , xφ(n)} be a reduced residue system (mod n) and let a be any integer coprime to n. The proof hinges on the fundamental fact that multiplication by a permutes the xi: in other words if axj ≡ axk (mod n) then j = k. (This law of cancellation is proved in the article Multiplicative group of integers modulo n.) That is, the sets R and aR = {ax1, ax2, ... , axφ(n)}, considered as sets of congruence classes (mod n), are identical (as sets, they may be listed in different orders), so the product of all the numbers in R is congruent (mod n) to the product of all the numbers in aR:
\(\prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} x_i \equiv \prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} ax_i = a^{\varphi(n)}\prod_{i=1}^{\varphi(n)} x_i \pmod{n},\) and using the cancellation law to cancel each xi gives Euler's theorem:
\(a^{\varphi(n)}\equiv 1 \pmod{n}.\)
이제 너 계산기는 이것을 해결하지 않지만, 그 조각은 계산 가능합니다. 아래의 하나를 시도하거나 자신의 것을 입력하십시오.
여기서 사용된 기호
기호를 탭하면 전체 정의, 이미지 및 각 문자의 의미를 확인할 수 있습니다.
사람들이 묻는 질문
Why are primes so important?
Every integer factors into primes in exactly one way, so primes are the atoms of multiplication. Cryptography relies on that factoring being easy to state and hard to do.
How do I tell whether a big number is prime?
Trial division up to the square root works for small numbers. For large ones, probabilistic tests (Miller-Rabin) give an answer that is wrong with negligible probability, and deterministic tests (AKS) exist but are slower.
이 페이지의 일부는 다음에서 변경되었습니다. Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). 여기서 압축하고 다시 설명; 오류는 우리의.
에 더 Number Theory
Prime factorisationPrime numbersGCD and LCMModular arithmeticDivisorsSequencesNumber basesDiophantine equationsFermat's little theorem and Euler's theoremRSA: cryptography from number theory