maths.free › Numerical Methods › Floating point and error
Floating point and error
Why 0.1 + 0.2 ≠ 0.3 on a computer, and how error propagates.
Computers store numbers in binary with ~16 significant digits; 0.1 is not representable exactly. Round-off accumulates, and subtracting nearly equal numbers destroys digits (cancellation). Picture it: 255 in binary is 11111111, and 0.1 in binary never terminates. Think it: a stable algorithm keeps error growth linear; conditioning is a property of the problem, stability of the method.
Apstrādāts piemērs · 0.1 + 0.2
Solis pēc kārtas
- 0.3 = \frac{3}{10}
Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.
- \frac{3}{10} = 0.3
Simplify.
Atbildēt uz šo jautājumu
Tagad tu Izvēlieties problēmu, vai ierakstiet vai zīmējiet savu. Katrs solis, attēls, atbilde slēpta, līdz jūs lūgt.
Bezmaksas konts pievieno piezīmes par katru nodarbību, ierakstu par to, ko esat pabeidzis, jūsu atrisinātās problēmas vienā vietā, un pasniedzēju, kuru varat jautāt par šo lapu. Pati matemātika ir pieejama ikvienam, kas ir vai nav parakstījies.
Pierakstīties PieteikšanāsŠeit izmantotie simboli
Piesitiet visiem simboliem, kas apzīmē pilnu definīciju, attēlu un ko katrs burts tajā nozīmē.
Kā lietot: Floating point and error
- Add: 0.1 + 0.2 = 3/10.
- Simplify.
Jautājumi, ko cilvēki vaicā
Why not just solve exactly?
Most equations have no closed-form solution at all, and many that do are unusable in practice. A numerical method delivers as many correct digits as you need, and a good one tells you how many that is.
Why can Newton's method fail?
If it starts where the tangent is nearly flat it shoots far away; near a repeated root it slows to a crawl; and with several roots it may land on the wrong one. A bracketing method like bisection is slower but cannot fail.
Vairāk Numerical Methods
Root finding: bisection and Newton's methodNumerical integration: trapezoid and SimpsonInterpolation and Taylor approximation