maths.free › Real Analysis › The real line › Weierstrass function
Weierstrass function
In mathematics, the Weierstrass function, named after its discoverer, Karl Weierstrass, is an example of a real-valued function that is continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere.
Weierstrass function
In mathematics, the Weierstrass function, named after its discoverer, Karl Weierstrass, is an example of a real-valued function that is continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere. It is also an example of a fractal curve.
The Weierstrass function has historically served the role of a pathological function, being the first published example (1872) specifically concocted to challenge the notion that every continuous function is differentiable except on a set of isolated points. Weierstrass's demonstration that continuity did not imply almost-everywhere differentiability upended mathematics, overturning several proofs that relied on geometric intuition and vague definitions of smoothness. These types of functions were disliked by contemporaries. For instance, Charles Hermite, on finding that one class of function he was working on had such a property, described it as a "lamentable scourge". The functions were difficult to visualize until the arrival of computers in the next century, and the results did not gain wide acceptance until practical applications such as models of Brownian motion necessitated infinitely jagged functions (nowadays known as fractal curves).
Construction
In Weierstrass's original paper, the function was defined as a Fourier series:
\[\ f(x)=\sum_{n=0} ^\infty a^n \cos(b^n \pi x)\ ,\]
where \(\ 0 < a < 1\ ,\) and \(\ b\\) is a positive odd integer, and
\[\ a\ b > 1 + \tfrac{3}{2}\ \pi ~.\]
The minimum value of \(\ b\\) for which there exists \(\ 0 < a < 1\\) such that these constraints are satisfied is \(\ b = 7 ~.\) This construction, along with the proof that the function is not differentiable at any point, was first delivered by Weierstrass in a paper presented to the Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften on 18 July 1872.
Despite being differentiable nowhere, the function is continuous: Since the terms of the infinite series which defines it are bounded by \(\ \pm a^n\\) and this has finite sum for \(\ 0 < a < 1\ ,\) convergence of the sum of the terms is uniform by the Weierstrass M-test with \(\ M_n = a^n ~.\) Since each partial sum is continuous, by the uniform limit theorem, it follows that \(\ f\\) is continuous. Additionally, since each partial sum is uniformly continuous, it follows that \(\ f\\) is also uniformly continuous.
It might be expected that a continuous function must have a derivative, or that the set of points where it is not differentiable should be countably infinite or finite. According to Weierstrass in his paper, earlier mathematicians including Gauss had often assumed that this was true. This might be because it is difficult to draw or visualise a continuous function whose set of nondifferentiable points is something other than a countable set of points. Analogous results for better behaved classes of continuous functions do exist, for example the Lipschitz functions, whose set of non-differentiability points must be a Lebesgue null set (Rademacher's theorem). When we try to draw a general continuous function, we usually draw the graph of a function which is Lipschitz or otherwise well-behaved. Moreover, the fact that the set of non-differentiability points for a monotone function is measure-zero implies that the rapid oscillations of Weierstrass' function are necessary to ensure that it is nowhere-differentiable.
Condensed: the full section is in Wikipedia.
Riemann function
The Weierstrass function is based on the earlier Riemann function, claimed to be differentiable nowhere. Occasionally, this function \[f(x) = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{\sin(n^2x)}{n^2}\] has also been called "the" Weierstrass function or "a" Weierstrass function.
While Bernhard Riemann strongly claimed that the function is differentiable nowhere, no evidence of this was published by Riemann, and Weierstrass noted that he did not find any evidence of it surviving either in Riemann's papers or orally from his students.
In 1916, G. H. Hardy confirmed that the function does not have a finite derivative in any value of \(\pi x\) where x is irrational or is rational with the form of either \(\frac{2A}{4B+1}\) or \(\ \frac{2A+1}{2B}\ ,\) where A and B are integers. In 1969, Joseph Gerver found that the Riemann function has a defined differential on every value of x that can be expressed in the form of \(\ \frac{2A+1}{2B+1}\ \pi\\) with integer A and B; that is, rational multipliers of \(\ \pi\\) with an odd numerator and denominator. On these points, the function has a derivative of \(\ -\frac{1}{2}\\). In 1971, J. Gerver showed that the function has no finite differential at the values of x that can be expressed in the form of \(\ \frac{2A}{2B+1}\ \pi\ ,\) completing the problem of the differentiability of the Riemann function.
As the Riemann function is differentiable only on a null set of points, it is differentiable almost nowhere.
Hölder continuity
It is convenient to write the Weierstrass function equivalently as
\[\ W_\alpha(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty b^{-n\alpha}\ \cos(b^n \pi x)\\]
for \(\ \alpha \equiv -\frac{\ln(a)}{\ln(b)} ~.\) Then \(\ W_\alpha(x)\\) is Hölder continuous of exponent α, which is to say that there is a constant K such that
\[\ \Bigl|\ W_\alpha(x) - W_\alpha(y)\ \Bigr|\ \le\ K\ \left|\ x - y\ \right|^\alpha\\]
for all \(\ x\\) and \(\ y ~.\) Moreover, \(\ W_1\\) is Hölder continuous of all orders \(\ \alpha < 1\\) but not Lipschitz continuous.
Density of nowhere-differentiable functions
It turns out that the Weierstrass function is far from being an isolated example: although it is "pathological", it is also "typical" of continuous functions:
- In a topological sense: the set of nowhere-differentiable real-valued functions on [0, 1] is comeager in the vector space C([0, 1]; ℝ) of all continuous real-valued functions on [0, 1] with the topology of uniform convergence.
- In a measure-theoretic sense: when the space C([0, 1]; ℝ) is equipped with classical Wiener measure γ, the collection of functions that are differentiable at even a single point of [0, 1] has γ-measure zero. The same is true even if one takes finite-dimensional "slices" of C([0, 1]; ℝ) , in the sense that the nowhere-differentiable functions form a prevalent subset of C([0, 1]; ℝ) .
Ugbu a ị Enweghị kalkulata na-ewepụ nke a, ma ọ bụ na ọ nwere ike ijikwa ya. Jiri otu n'okpuru, mọọbụ pịa nke gị.
Aịkọn ndị ahụ ejirila ebe a
Tinye ọbụla simbụl maka nkọwa zuru ezu, inyogo, na ihe ọbụla ọbụla na-egosi.
Ajụjụ ndị mmadụ jụrụ
What is the ε, δ definition actually saying?
That you can make the output as close to the limit as anyone demands (within ε) by keeping the input close enough (within δ). It replaces "approaches" with a challenge-and-response that can be checked.
Why does the harmonic series diverge when its terms go to zero?
Because the terms shrink too slowly: group them as 1/3 + 1/4 > 1/2, 1/5 + … + 1/8 > 1/2, and so on: infinitely many halves.
Oge nke ihuakwụkwọ a bụ nke a gbanwere site na Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0). E kọwaara ya na ebe a; nsogbu bụ nke anyị.
Oge Real Analysis
Sequences and their limitsConvergence of seriesImproper integralsTaylor approximation and errorFunctions of a complex variableContinuity and differentiability, rigorouslySequences of functions and uniform convergence